You are viewing an historical archive of past issues. Please report new issues to the appropriate project issue tracker on GitHub.

Bug #1634: Alternate file "forgotten" after dismissing Command-T

Kind bug
Product Command-T
When Created , updated
Status open
Reporter Greg Hurrell
Tags no tags

Description

From a user email:

I find it strange that command-t makes vim forget the alternate file. If I'm bouncing between two files using Control-6, then I pull up command-t and dismiss it with C-C, then when I hit Control-6 again I get "E23: No alternate file". bufexplorer.vim handles this correctly: bringing up and dismissing the bufexplorer doesn't affect the alternate file.

Comments

  1. anonymous

    When you dismiss Command-T, is it correctly selecting the previously active buffer, or has it selected some other buffer?

    Yes, it returns to the correct, previously-active buffer. Does it not do this for you?

  2. Greg Hurrell

    Yeah, it's supposed to select the correct buffer, but I just wanted to make sure that it was doing the right thing for you. I haven't yet been able to reproduce the bug that you describe.

  3. Greg Hurrell

    Marked ticket #1761 as a duplicate of this one.

Add a comment

Comments are now closed for this issue.

Menu