You are viewing an historical archive of past issues. Please
report new issues to the appropriate project issue tracker on
GitHub.
Comments
-
Greg Hurrell
Status changed:
- From: New
- To: Open
-
Greg Hurrell
There are two options for how such body-less issues would be shown:
- either omit the description entirely (from the "show" HTML template) and in the Atom feed where something is needed just repeat the summary as the description
- or repeat the summary as the description (possibly in a "before validate" or "before save" hook)
-
Greg Hurrell
Ok, I've come to the following conclusions:
- The description field is not always necessary
- It therefore should not be included in validations
- If it is not necessary there is no need to replicate across the summary field automatically
- For consistency with the tags field, which displays "none" when there are no tags, the description field should also display "none" when there is no description (HTML view)
- In the Atom feed, instead of "none" we will indeed autoreplicate
- Even though the field is optional we do not actually want to encourage users to file issues without descriptions; as such we will not explicitly advertise it as "optional" (we don't want users filing useless issues because their summary is not detailed enough and they omit the description)
-
Greg Hurrell
Status changed:
- From: Open
- To: Closed
Add a comment
Comments are now closed for this issue.